Current:Home > reviewsWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -FundTrack
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
View
Date:2025-04-15 14:58:11
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (5664)
Related
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Court rejects Donald Trump’s bid to delay trial in wake of fraud ruling that threatens his business
- Plane that crashed, killing Rep. Peltola’s husband, had over 500 pounds of meat and antlers on board
- Murder suspect mistakenly released from Indianapolis jail captured in Minnesota
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Gun control among new laws taking effect in Maryland
- Taylor Swift has power to swing the presidential election. What if nothing else matters?
- The Turkish government withdraws from a film festival after a documentary was reinstated
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Michael Gambon, who played Dumbledore in 'Harry Potter,' dies at 82
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Travis King, the U.S. soldier who crossed South Korea's border into North Korea, is back in U.S.
- Emirati and Egyptian central banks agree to a currency swap deal as Egypt’s economy struggles
- Suspect Jason Billingsley arrested in murder of Baltimore tech CEO Pava LaPere
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Authorities probe Amazon 'click activity' for possible knives in Idaho killings
- Watch Ronald Acuna Jr.'s epic celebration as he becomes first member of MLB's 40-70 club
- Judge Tanya Chutkan denies Trump's request for her recusal in Jan. 6 case
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
North Carolina’s governor vetoes bill that would take away his control over election boards
DNA sample from suspect in Gilgo Beach murders matches pizza crust, prosecutors say
Remains found of Suzanne Morphew, Colorado mother missing since 2020
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
US guitarist Al Di Meola suffers a heart attack in Romania but is now in a stable condition
Romanian court eases geographical restrictions on divisive influencer Andrew Tate
Food prices are rising as countries limit exports. Blame climate change, El Nino and Russia’s war